- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-851/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 15 July 2021 — DK v European External Action Service (Appeal — Civil service — Disciplinary proceedings — Disciplinary penalty — Determination of that penalty — Withholding of an amount from the pension — Criminal conviction and civil sanction before national courts — Compensation, in whole or in part, for non-material damage caused to the European Union — Lack of relevance of that compensation — Article 10 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union — Principle of equal treatment — Principle of proportionality)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019CA0851
62019CA0851
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
30.8.2021
Official Journal of the European Union
C 349/8
(Case C-851/19 P) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Appeal - Civil service - Disciplinary proceedings - Disciplinary penalty - Determination of that penalty - Withholding of an amount from the pension - Criminal conviction and civil sanction before national courts - Compensation, in whole or in part, for non-material damage caused to the European Union - Lack of relevance of that compensation - Article 10 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union - Principle of equal treatment - Principle of proportionality)
(2021/C 349/09)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Appellant: DK (represented: initially by S. Orlandi and T. Martin, and subsequently by S. Orlandi, avocats)
Other party to the proceedings: European External Action Service (represented by: S. Marquardt and R. Spáč, acting as Agents)
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the appeal;
2.Orders DK to pay the costs.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 68, 2.3.2020.
Language of the case: French