EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-239/25, Fincontinuo: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice di pace di Palermo (Italy) lodged on 28 March 2025 – Fincontinuo SpA v LF

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62025CN0239

62025CN0239

March 28, 2025
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

C series

C/2025/3500

7.7.2025

(Case C-239/25, Fincontinuo)

(C/2025/3500)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Fincontinuo SpA

Defendant: LF

Questions referred

1)In the context of national legislation providing for transparency and verification instruments that require lending institutions to quantify and apportion costs, in a transparent manner, according to their nature, dependent or non-dependent on the duration of the agreement, and to inform the consumer in advance, inter alia, by means of the SECCI form, does the system provided for in Article 16(1) of Directive 2008/48/EC (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008, as interpreted by the Court of Justice in the Lexitor judgment (C-383/18) and in the light also of the principles expressed by the Court in the Unicredit Austria (C-555/21) and Santander (C-76/22) judgments, preclude an interpretation of that national legislation under which the reimbursement to the consumer of the ‘total cost of the credit’ covers only costs indicated as dependent on the duration of the credit agreement in the transparency documentation provided to the consumer?

2)Do the provisions of Article 16(1) of Directive 2008/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 preclude an interpretation of national legislation under which, in the event of reimbursement to the consumer of the ‘total cost of the credit’, the lending institute is not required to reduce proportionately the costs relating to the activities carried out by third parties during the pre-contractual stage, whether the relevant amounts are paid directly by the consumer or indirectly through the lending institute?

3)Does the general principle of EU law prohibiting unjust enrichment and Article 16(1) of Directive 2008/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 preclude an interpretation of national legislation according to which the reimbursement to the consumer of the ‘total cost of the credit’ also includes costs which are not dependent on the duration of the agreement and are payable in respect of services which have already been fully performed at the time of the early repayment of the credit, even where transparent and detailed information has been provided?

Directive 2008/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 on credit agreements for consumers and repealing Council Directive 87/102/EEC (OJ 2008, L 133, p. 66).

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3500/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia