- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-617/16: Judgment of the General Court of 23 November 2017 — PF v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Promotion — 2015 promotion exercise — Articles 43 and 45(1) of the Staff Regulations — Duty to provide a statement of reasons — Consideration of comparative merits — Use of languages in the context of the duties performed by administrators assigned to linguistic duties and by administrators assigned to non-linguistic duties — Legitimate absences — Manifest error of assessment)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TA0617
62016TA0617
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 13/16
(Case T-617/16) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
((Civil service - Officials - Promotion - 2015 promotion exercise - Articles 43 and 45(1) of the Staff Regulations - Duty to provide a statement of reasons - Consideration of comparative merits - Use of languages in the context of the duties performed by administrators assigned to linguistic duties and by administrators assigned to non-linguistic duties - Legitimate absences - Manifest error of assessment))
(2018/C 013/26)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: PF (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Berscheid and C. Berardis-Kayser, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking annulment of the Commission’s decision not to promote the applicant to Grade AD 8 in the 2015 promotion exercise.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders PF to pay the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 371, 10.10.2016 (Case initially registered before the European Union Civil Service Tribunal as Case F-47/16 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1 September 2016).