- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-39/16: Action brought on 25 January 2016 — Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp v OHIM — Fink (NANA FINK)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TN0039
62016TN0039
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
21.3.2016
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 106/43
(Case T-39/16)
(2016/C 106/51)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp GmbH & Co. KG (Bremen, Germany) (represented by: T. Boddien, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Nadine Fink (Basle, Switzerland)
Details of the proceedings before OHIM
Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the figurative mark containing the word elements ‘NANA FINK’ — International registration designating the European Union No IR 1 111 651
Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 November 2015 in Case R 679/2014-1
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision in opposition proceedings B 2 125 543 (International trade mark registration No IR 1 111 651);
—order OHIM to pay the costs.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.