- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-323/18: Judgment of the General Court of 11 April 2019 — Fomanu v EUIPO — Fujifilm Imaging GermanyReresentation of a butterfly) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU figurative mark representing a butterfly — Genuine use of the mark — Partial revocation — Article 18(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Article 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation 2017/1001)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018TA0323
62018TA0323
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 187/76
Judgment of the General Court of 11 April 2019 — Fomanu v EUIPO — Fujifilm Imaging Germany Reresentation of a butterfly)
(Case T-323/18) (*)
(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU figurative mark representing a butterfly - Genuine use of the mark - Partial revocation - Article 18(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Article 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation 2017/1001)
(2019/C 187/81)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Fomanu AG (Neustadt an der Waldnaab, Germany) (represented by: S. Reichart, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: R. Manea and D. Walicka, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Fujifilm Imaging Germany GmbH & Co. KG (Willich, Germany)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 March 2018 (Case R 2241/2016-2) relating to revocation proceedings between Fujifilm Imaging Germany and Fomanu.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Fomanu AG to pay the costs.
(*) Language of the case: German.
(1) OJ C 240, 9.7.2018.