I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-257/13) (<span class="super">1</span>)
((Request for a preliminary ruling - Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Absence of sufficient information concerning the factual and regulatory background to the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling - Manifest inadmissibility))
2014/C 102/14
Language of the case: French
Applicant: Anouthani Mlamali
Defendant: Caisse d’allocations familiales des Bouches-du-Rhône
Request for a preliminary ruling — Tribunal des affaires de sécurité sociale des Bouches du Rhône — Interpretation of Article 11 of Directive 2003/109/EC of 25 November 2003 concerning the status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents (OJ 2004 L 16, p. 44) — Legally resident third-country national — Rejection of a claim for family allowances in respect of a dependent minor child who is himself a third-country national — Non-compliance with the statutory provisions concerning family reunification — Rejection based on the failure provide a medical certificate issued by the Agence nationale de l'accueil des étrangers et des migrations (National Agency for the reception of foreign nationals and migrants) — Equal treatment.
The request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal des affaires de sécurité sociale des Bouches du Rhône (France), made by decision of 13 May 2013, is manifestly inadmissible.
(<span class="note">1</span>) OJ C 207, 20.7.2013.