- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-372/16: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 20 December 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht München — Germany) — Soha Sahyouni v Raja Mamisch (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Regulation (EU) No 1259/2010 — Enhanced cooperation in the area of the law applicable to divorce and legal separation — Recognition of a private divorce obtained before a religious court in a third country — Scope of that regulation)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016CA0372
62016CA0372
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
26.2.2018
Official Journal of the European Union
C 72/16
(Case C-372/16) (<a id="ntc1-C_2018072EN.01001602-E0001" href="#ntr1-C_2018072EN.01001602-E0001"> (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)</a>
((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Area of freedom, security and justice - Regulation (EU) No 1259/2010 - Enhanced cooperation in the area of the law applicable to divorce and legal separation - Recognition of a private divorce obtained before a religious court in a third country - Scope of that regulation))
(2018/C 072/21)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Soha Sahyouni
Defendant: Raja Mamisch
Operative part of the judgment
Article 1 of Council Regulation (EU) No 1259/2010 of 20 December 2010 implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of the law applicable to divorce and legal separation must be interpreted as meaning that a divorce resulting from a unilateral declaration made by one of the spouses before a religious court, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, does not come within the substantive scope of that regulation.
* Language of the case: German.
(2018/C 072/21)
* * *
(<span class="super note-tag">1</span>) <a href="./../../../../legal-content/EN/AUTO/?uri=OJ:C:2016:343:TOC">OJ C 343, 19.9.2016</a>.