- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-251/21: Action brought on 11 May 2021 — Tigercat International v EUIPO — Caterpillar (Tigercat)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TN0251
62021TN0251
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 263/28
(Case T-251/21)
(2021/C 263/37)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Tigercat International Inc. (Cambridge, Ontario, Canada) (represented by: S. Weidert, M. Pemsel and H. Bug, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Caterpillar Inc. (Peoria, Illinois, United States)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark Tigercat — Application for registration No 12 124 368
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 February 2021 in Case R 16/2020-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO and the other parties to the proceedings before the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO to pay the costs including the costs in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 60(1)(a) in connection with Article 8(1)(b) and Article 85(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.