EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-206/11: Action brought on 4 April 2011 — COMPLEX v OHIM — Kajometal (KX)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011TN0206

62011TN0206

April 4, 2011
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 194/14

(Case T-206/11)

2011/C 194/22

Language in which the application was lodged: Polish

Parties

Applicant: COMPLEX S.A. (Łódź, Poland) (represented by: R. Rumpel, legal adviser)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Kajometal s.r.o. (Dolny Kubin, Slovakia)

Form of order sought

declare the action to be well founded;

annul the decision delivered by the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) on 21 January 2011 in Case R 864/2010-2;

replace the contested decision by a decision refusing registration of the mark KX, No 61225405;

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Kajometal s.r.o.

Community trade mark concerned: word mark KX for goods in Class 7

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: the applicant

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community word mark CX, No 3 588 241, registered for goods in Class 7, Community figurative mark CX PRECISION BEARINGS, No 397 932 , registered for goods in Class 7

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition rejected

Decision of the Board of Appeal: appeal dismissed

Pleas in law: misapplication of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009, in that there is a likelihood of confusion as between the conflicting marks.

Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia