- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-347/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg (Luxembourg), lodged on 20 July 2012 — Caisse nationale des prestations familiales v Ulrike Wiering, Markus Wiering
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62012CN0347
62012CN0347
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
22.9.2012
Official Journal of the European Union
C 287/27
(Case C-347/12)
2012/C 287/52
Language of the case: French
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Caisse nationale des prestations familiales
Respondents: Ulrike Wiering, Markus Wiering
Question referred
For the calculation of any differential allowance that may be due, in accordance with Articles 1(u)(i), 4(1)(h) and 76 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community, (1) as amended, and with Article 10[(1)](b)(i) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 574/72 of 21 March 1972 fixing the procedure for implementing Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71, (2) by the competent institution of the State of the place of work, is it necessary to take into account, as family benefits of the same kind, all of the benefits received by the family of the migrant worker in the State of residence, in the present case the ‘Elterngeld’ and ‘Kindergeld’ provided for by German legislation?
(1) OJ, English Special Edition 1971(II), p. 416.
(2) OJ, English Special Edition 1972(I), p. 160.
Language of the case: French
* * *