I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-411/16) (*)
((Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken against Syria - Freezing of funds - Rights of the defence - Right to effective judicial protection - Obligation to state reasons - Manifest error of assessment - Right to honour and reputation - Right to property - Presumption of innocence - Proportionality))
(2019/C 72/21)
Language of the case: French
Applicant: Syriatel Mobile Telecom (Joint Stock Company) (Damascus, Syria) (represented by: E. Ruchat, lawyer)
Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: initially, S. Kyriakopoulou, A. Vitro and G. Étienne, subsequently S. Kyriakopoulou, A. Vitro and V. Piessevaux, and finally S. Kyriakopoulou and A. Vitro, acting as Agents)
Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/850 of 27 May 2016 amending Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2016 L 141, p. 125) and of the subsequent measures giving effect to that decision, of Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/917 of 29 May 2017 amending Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2017 L 139, p. 62) and of Council Decision (CFSP) 2018/778 of 28 May 2018 amending Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2018 L 131, p. 16), in so far as those acts concern the applicant.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Syriatel Mobile Telecom (Joint Stock Company) to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union.
(*) Language of the case: French.
(1) OJ C 364, 3.10.2016.