I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-717/17) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
((Action for annulment - ERCEA - Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (Horizon 2020) - Decision rejecting an application for revision of an evaluation of the research proposal - Administrative action before the Commission - Dismissal of the administrative action - Mistaken designation of the defendant - Application for directions to be issued - Manifest inadmissibility))
(2019/C 44/84)
Language of the case: Romanian
Applicant: Nicolae Chioreanu (Oradea, Romania) (represented by: D.-C. Rusu, lawyer)
Defendant: European Research Council Executive Agency (represented by: F. Sgritta and M.E. Chacón Mohedano, acting as Agents)
First, application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of (i) the decision of ERCEA of 23 March 2017 rejecting the application for revision of an evaluation of research proposal No 741797–NIP, ERC-2016–ADG ‘New and Innovative Powertrain — NIP’ and (ii) Commission Decision C(2017) 5190 final of 27 July 2017 dismissing the administrative action brought by the applicant under Article 22(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 58/2003 of 19 December 2002 laying down the statute for executive agencies to be entrusted with certain tasks in the management of Community programmes (OJ 2003 L 11, p. 1), and, second, application requesting the General Court to require ERCEA to revise the evaluation of the research proposal referred to above.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Mr Nicolae Chioreanu to pay the costs.
(<span class="note"> <a id="ntr1-C_2019044EN.01006501-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2019044EN.01006501-E0001">*1</a> </span> ) OJ C 13, 15.1.2018.