I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-277/12)(1)
(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark Caffè KIMBO - Earlier national word mark BIMBO - Relative grounds for refusal - Well-known trade mark within the meaning of Article 6 bis of the Paris Convention - Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
2013/C 129/38
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Bimbo, SA (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: J. Carbonell Callicó, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Café do Brasil SpA (Melito di Napoli, Italy) (represented by: M. Mostardini, G. Galimberti and F. Melluci, lawyers)
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 15 May 2012 (Case R 1017/2011-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Bimbo, SA and Café do Brasil SpA
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Bimbo, SA, to pay the costs.
OJ C 273, 8.9.2012.