- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-211/19: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 30 April 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Miskolci Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság — Hungary) — UO v Készenléti Rendőrség (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Protection of the safety and health of workers — Directive 2003/88/EC — Scope — Derogation — Article 1(3) — Directive 89/391/EEC — Article 2(2) — Activities of rapid intervention police officers)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019CA0211
62019CA0211
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 240/22
(Case C-211/19)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Social policy - Protection of the safety and health of workers - Directive 2003/88/EC - Scope - Derogation - Article 1(3) - Directive 89/391/EEC - Article 2(2) - Activities of rapid intervention police officers)
(2020/C 240/29)
Language of the case: Hungarian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: UO
Defendant: Készenléti Rendőrség
Operative part of the judgment
Article 1(3) of Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time must be interpreted as meaning that Article 2(1) and (2) of that directive applies to members of law enforcement agencies carrying out surveillance functions at the external borders of a Member State in the event of an influx of third-country nationals to those borders, except where it appears, having regard to all relevant circumstances, that the tasks carried out are being performed in the context of exceptional events, the gravity and scale of which require the adoption of measures indispensable for the protection of the life, health and safety of the community at large, measures the proper implementation of which would be jeopardised if all the rules laid down in that directive were to be observed, this being a matter for the referring court to determine.
(1)
OJ C 187, 3.6.2019.