- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-724/20: Action brought on 14 December 2020 — Senseon Tech v EUIPO — Accuride International (SENSEON)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TN0724
62020TN0724
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
8.2.2021
Official Journal of the European Union
C 44/53
(Case T-724/20)
(2021/C 44/76)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Senseon Tech Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: P. Andreottola and M. Li Trenta, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Accuride International Inc. (Santa Fe Springs, California, United States)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark SENSEON — Application for registration No 17 758 831
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 30 September 2020 in Case R 2736/2019-1
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—uphold the applicant’s appeal against the contested decision in its entirety;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs of the applicant.
Pleas in law
—Error in the assessment of the relevant public;
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council in relation to the determination of similarity of goods and services;
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council in relation to the overall assessment.