- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-697/18: Judgment of the General Court of 29 January 2020 — Aldi v EUIPO — Titlbach (ALTISPORT) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark ALTISPORT — Earlier international and EU word marks ALDI — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Comparison of the goods and services — Obligation to state reasons — Article 94 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018TA0697
62018TA0697
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 77/45
(Case T-697/18) (*)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Figurative mark ALTISPORT - Earlier international and EU word marks ALDI - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Comparison of the goods and services - Obligation to state reasons - Article 94 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(2020/C 77/64)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Aldi GmbH & Co. KG (Mülheim an der Ruhr, Germany) (represented by: N. Lützenrath, U. Rademacher, C. Fürsen and M. Minkner, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Markakis and A. Söder, acting as agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Aleš Titlbach (Meziboří, Czech Republic)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 September 2018 (Case R 2683/2017-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Aldi and Mr Titlbach.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 19 September 2018 (Case R 2683/2017-4) in so far as it concerns ‘toys’ in Class 28 of the Nice Agreement concerning the International Classification of Goods and Services for the Purposes of the Registration of Marks of 15 June 1957, as revised and amended;
2.Dismisses the action as to the remainder;
3.Orders the parties to bear their own costs.
(*) Language of the case: German.
OJ C 25, 21.1.2019.