- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-629/19: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 14 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark — Austria) — Sappi Austria Produktions-GmbH & Co. KG, Wasserverband ‘Region Gratkorn-Gratwein’ v Landeshauptmann von Steiermark (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Waste — Directive 2008/98/EC — Article 2(2)(a), point 1 of Article 3 and Article 6(1) — Waste water — Sewage sludge — Scope — Concept of ‘waste’ — Cessation of waste status — Recovery or recycling operation)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019CA0629
62019CA0629
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
7.12.2020
Official Journal of the European Union
C 423/12
(Case C-629/19) (*)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Environment - Waste - Directive 2008/98/EC - Article 2(2)(a), point 1 of Article 3 and Article 6(1) - Waste water - Sewage sludge - Scope - Concept of ‘waste’ - Cessation of waste status - Recovery or recycling operation)
(2020/C 423/18)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicants: Sappi Austria Produktions-GmbH & Co. KG, Wasserverband ‘Region Gratkorn-Gratwein’
Defendant: Landeshauptmann von Steiermark
Operative part of the judgment
Article 2(2)(a), point 1 of Article 3 and Article 6(1) of Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives must be interpreted as meaning that sewage sludge generated during the joint treatment of industrial and residential or municipal waste water in a sewage treatment plant, which is incinerated in a waste incineration plant for the purposes of energy recovery by generating steam, must be regarded as not being waste if the conditions in Article 6(1) of Directive 2008/98 are already met before its incineration. It is for the referring court to determine whether that is the case in the main proceedings.
(*)
Language of the case: German.
ECLI:EU:C:2020:140