EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-767/23, Remling : Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 13 December 2023 – A.M. v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CN0767

62023CN0767

December 13, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2024/2281

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 13 December 2023 — A.M. v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid

(Case C-767/23, Remling (1))

(C/2024/2281)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: A.M.

Defendant: Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid

Question referred

Must the third paragraph of Article 267 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, read in the light of the second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, be interpreted as precluding national legislation such as Article 91(2) of the Vreemdelingenwet 2000 (Law on foreign nationals of 2000), under which the Afdeling bestuursrechtspraak van de Raad van State (Administrative Law Division of the Council of State), as a national court whose decisions are not amenable to appeal, can rule summarily, without substantiating which of the three exceptions to its obligation to refer occurs, on a question raised about the interpretation of EU law, whether or not in conjunction with an explicit request for a preliminary ruling?

(1) The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2281/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia