EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-515/14 P: Appeal brought on 9 July 2014 by Christodoulos Alexandrou against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 14 May 2014 in Case F-34/13 Alexandrou v Commission

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014TN0515

62014TN0515

July 9, 2014
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C 292/56

(Case T-515/14 P)

2014/C 292/69

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Christodoulos Alexandrou (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by R. Duta, lawyer)

Respondent: European Commission

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the General Court should:

admit the present appeal, declare it well founded;

therefore, amend or set aside the judgment under appeal, on the basis of the grounds set out;

in so far as is necessary, refer the case in the course of the proceedings to the European Civil Service Tribunal;

order the respondent to pay the entirety of the costs and expenses of the two proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of its action, the appellant invokes three grounds of appeal.

1.First ground of appeal alleges a failure to give sufficient reasons in the contested decision, connected in particular with the Commission’s refusal to grant the appellant’s application to have access to the seven questions which he allegedly failed.

2.Second ground of appeal alleges an infringement of the right to an effective remedy, in so far as, without having the questions requested at his disposal, the appellant was deprived of the means of an effective remedy against the decision to reject his application.

3.Third ground of appeal alleges a failure, by the Civil Service Tribunal, to use Article 4(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Civil Service Tribunal.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia