I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-264/19) (*)
(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU figurative mark viscover - Absence of bad faith - Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 2017/1001) - Article 53(2)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 60(2)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001))
(2020/C 414/55)
Language of the case: German
Applicant: nanoPET Pharma GmbH (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: C. Onken and A. Schulz, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Hanf, Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Miltenyi Biotec BV & Co. KG, formerly Miltenyi Biotec GmbH (Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) (represented by: M. Schork, lawyer)
Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 17 January 2019 (Case R 1288/2017-5), concerning invalidity proceedings between nanoPET Pharma and Miltenyi Biotec.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders nanoPET Pharma GmbH to pay the costs.
(*)
Language of the case: German
* * *
(1) OJ C 206, 17.6.2019.