EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-137/11: Action brought on 11 March 2011 — Guiai Bi Poin v Council

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011TN0137

62011TN0137

March 11, 2011
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

30.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 130/22

(Case T-137/11)

2011/C 130/42

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Georges Guiai Bi Poin (Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire) (represented by: G. Collard, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

declare that, concerning the applicant, Mr Georges GUIAI BI POIN, Council Regulation (EU) No 25/2011 of 14 January 2011 and Council Decision 2011/18/CFSP of 14 January 2011, published on 15 January 2011 in the Official Journal of the European Union, are not justified in fact,

consequently,

annul Council Regulation (EU) No 25/2011 of 14 January 2011 and Council Decision 2011/18/CFSP of 14 January 2011;

alternatively, order that the name of Mr Georges GUIAI BI POIN be removed from the lists annexed to that regulation and to that decision.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant puts forward two pleas in law.

1.First plea in law alleging a breach of the obligation to state reasons, in so far as the grounds for including the applicant on the list of persons and entities to which the restrictive measures apply are stereotyped without any specific factual element making it possible to assess the relevance of that inclusion being mentioned.

2.Second plea in law alleging a manifest error of assessment, in so far as:

the applicant is accused of refusing to place himself under the authority of the democratically elected president, A. Ouattara, whereas the applicant may not in the capacity of a soldier avoid obeying the constitutional authorities of his country which have declared L. Gbagbo elected president and

the applicant is accused of being responsible for serious breaches of human rights and international humanitarian law, whereas the applicant has not been challenged by the International Criminal Court whose jurisdiction has been recognised by the Republic of Côte d’Ivoire.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia