I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Series C
(C/2024/449)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: e-dialog GmbH (Vienna, Austria) (represented by: C. Kletzer and W. Mosing, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Dialoga Servicios Interactivos, SA (Bilbao, Spain)
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark Dialoga — European Union trade mark No 8 917 155
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 September 2023 in Case R 97/2023-5
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision with the consequence that EUIPO will revoke the trade mark at issue;
—order EUIPO and, in case it intervenes, the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs of the applicant incurred in proceedings before the General Court and the appellate proceedings before EUIPO.
—Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) read in conjunction with Article 18(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council and with Article 10(3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/449/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
* * *