EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-502/07: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny (Poland) lodged on 16 November 2007 — K-1 sp. z o.o. v Dyrektor Izby Skarbowej w Bydgoszczy

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62007CN0502

62007CN0502

January 1, 2007
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

26.1.2008

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/30

(Case C-502/07)

(2008/C 22/55)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: K-1 sp. z o.o.

Defendant: Dyrektor Izby Skarbowej w Bydgoszczy

Questions referred

1.Do the first and second paragraphs of Article 2 of First Council Directive 67/227/EEC (1) of 11 April 1967 on the harmonisation of legislation of Member States concerning turnover taxes, in conjunction with Articles 2, 10(1)(a) and 10(2) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC (2) of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment, rule out the possibility of imposing an obligation on a taxable person for the purpose of tax on goods and services to pay an additional tax liability within the terms of Article 109(5) and (6) of the Ustawa o Podatku od Towarów i Usług (Law on the tax on goods and services) of 11 March 2004 (Dz. U. No 54, pos 535 with amendments) in the event that it is established that the taxable person for the purpose of tax on goods and services indicated in the tax declaration submitted an amount of the tax difference to be repaid or the input tax to be repaid which is greater than the amount due?

2.Can ‘special measures’ within the terms of Article 27(1) of the Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment, consist, having regard to their character and purpose, in the possibility of imposing on a taxable person for the purpose of tax on goods and services an additional tax liability fixed by a decision of the tax authority where it is established that the taxable person has declared an overstated amount of the tax difference to be repaid or an overstated amount of input tax to be repaid?

3.Does the power provided for by Article 33 of the Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment, encompass the right to introduce the additional tax liability laid down in Article 109(5) and (6) of the Ustawa o Podatku od Towarów i Usług of 11 March 2004 (Dz. U. No 54, pos 535 with amendments)?

(1) OJ, English Special Edition 1967, p. 14.

(2) OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia