EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-366/10: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 21 December 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice, Queen’s Bench Division (Administrative Court) — United Kingdom) — Air Transport Association of America, American Airlines Inc., Continental Airlines Inc., United Airlines Inc. v Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2003/87/EC — Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading — Directive 2008/101/EC — Inclusion of aviation activities in that scheme — Validity — Chicago Convention — Kyoto Protocol — EU-United States Air Transport Agreement — Principles of customary international law — Legal effects thereof — Whether they may be relied upon — Extraterritoriality of European Union law — Meaning of ‘charges’ , ‘fees’ and ‘taxes’ )

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62010CA0366

62010CA0366

December 21, 2011
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

18.2.2012

Official Journal of the European Union

C 49/7

(Case C-366/10) (<a id="ntc1-C_2012049EN.01000701-E0001" href="#ntr1-C_2012049EN.01000701-E0001"> (<span class="super">1</span>)</a>

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 2003/87/EC - Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading - Directive 2008/101/EC - Inclusion of aviation activities in that scheme - Validity - Chicago Convention - Kyoto Protocol - EU-United States Air Transport Agreement - Principles of customary international law - Legal effects thereof - Whether they may be relied upon - Extraterritoriality of European Union law - Meaning of ‘charges’, ‘fees’ and ‘taxes’)

2012/C 49/12

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Claimants: Air Transport Association of America, American Airlines Inc., Continental Airlines Inc., United Airlines Inc.

Defendant: Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change

Interveners: International Air Transport Association (IATA), National Airlines Council of Canada (NACC), Aviation Environment Federation, WWF-UK, European Federation for Transport and Environment, Environmental Defense Fund, Earthjustice

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — High Court of Justice, Queen’s Bench Division (Administrative Court) — Validity of Directive 2008/101/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 amending Directive 2003/87/EC so as to include aviation activities in the scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community (<a href="./../../../../legal-content/EN/AUTO/?uri=OJ:L:2009:008:TOC">OJ 2009 L 8, p. 3</a>) — Whether certain rules and/or provisions of international law may be relied upon

Operative part of the judgment

1.The only principles and provisions of international law, from among those mentioned by the referring court, that can be relied upon, in circumstances such as those of the main proceedings and for the purpose of assessing the validity of Directive 2008/101/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 amending Directive 2003/87/EC so as to include aviation activities in the scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community, are:

first, within the limits of review as to a manifest error of assessment attributable to the European Union regarding its competence, in the light of those principles, to adopt that directive:

the principle that each State has complete and exclusive sovereignty over its airspace,

the principle that no State may validly purport to subject any part of the high seas to its sovereignty, and

the principle which guarantees freedom to fly over the high seas,

and second:

Articles 7 and 11(1) and (2)(c) of the Air Transport Agreement concluded on 25 and 30 April 2007 between the United States of America, of the one part, and the European Community and its Member States, of the other part, as amended by the Protocol, and

Article 15(3) of that agreement, read in conjunction with Articles 2 and 3(4) thereof.

2.Examination of Directive 2008/101 has disclosed no factor of such a kind as to affect its validity.

(<a id="ntr1-C_2012049EN.01000701-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2012049EN.01000701-E0001">(<span class="super">1</span>)</a> <a href="./../../../../legal-content/EN/AUTO/?uri=OJ:C:2010:260:TOC">OJ C 260, 25.9.2010</a>.)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia