- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-304/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin (Germany) lodged on 10 May 2022 — PM v Senatsverwaltung für Justiz, Vielfalt und Antidiskriminierung
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022CN0304
62022CN0304
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 318/25
(Case C-304/22)
(2022/C 318/36)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: PM
Defendant: Senatsverwaltung für Justiz, Vielfalt und Antidiskriminierung
Other party to the proceedings: CM
Questions referred
The following questions concerning the interpretation of Article 1(1)(a), Article 2, point 4, Article 21(1) and Article 46 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000 (1) are referred for a preliminary ruling:
1.Is a divorce on the basis of Articles 82, 87, 89 and 90 of the Código Civil (Spanish Civil Code) a divorce within the meaning of the Brussels IIa Regulation?
2.If the first question is answered in the negative: Is a divorce on the basis of Articles 82, 87, 89 and 90 of the Spanish Civil Code to be treated in accordance with the rule contained in Article 46 of the Brussels IIa Regulation regarding authentic instruments and agreements?
(1) OJ 2003 L 338, p. 1; ‘the Brussels IIa Regulation’.