- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-630/19: Judgment of the General Court of 8 September 2021 — AH v Eurofound (Civil service — Members of the contract staff — Psychological harassment — Request for assistance — Action for annulment — Lis pendens — Interest in bringing proceedings — Admissibility — Rule of correspondence between the application and the complaint — Obligation to state reasons — Lack of competence of the author of an act — Error of assessment — Liability — Non-material damage)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TA0630
62019TA0630
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
25.10.2021
Official Journal of the European Union
C 431/29
(Case T-630/19) (*)
(Civil service - Members of the contract staff - Psychological harassment - Request for assistance - Action for annulment - Lis pendens - Interest in bringing proceedings - Admissibility - Rule of correspondence between the application and the complaint - Obligation to state reasons - Lack of competence of the author of an act - Error of assessment - Liability - Non-material damage)
(2021/C 431/31)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: AH (represented by: N. de Montigny, lawyer)
Defendant: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (represented by: F. van Boven and M. Jepsen, acting as Agents, and by C. Callanan, Solicitor)
Re:
Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of the decision of Eurofound of 9 November 2018 closing the administrative investigation AI-2018/01 opened following the applicant’s request for assistance in respect of alleged psychological harassment on the part of his superiors, and second, compensation for the non-material damage allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of that decision.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders AH to pay, in addition to his own costs, those incurred by the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (Eurofound).
(*) Language of the case: French.