I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
C series
—
(C/2025/1784)
Language of the case: Polish
Applicant: Wazdan Innovations ltd. (Ta’ Xbiex, Malta) (represented by: D. Hasik, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Trade mark at issue: Registration of the EU word mark ‘3 Coins’ – Application for registration No 18 859 517
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 December 2024 in Case R 504/2024-4
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—vary the contested decision, by upholding the appeal in Case R 504/2024-4 against the decision of EUIPO of 12 January 2024 (in so far as EUIPO dismissed that appeal), by accepting the registration of EU trademark No 18 859 517, in respect of all the goods and services (in accordance with the list thereof as limited as a result of the applicant’s letter of 25 June 2024) and by ordering the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings before the General Court of the European Union;
in the alternative:
—annul the contested decision in so far as concerns point 2 of the operative part;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings before the General Court of the European Union.
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—infringement of the general principles of EU law of equality, good administration and the protection of legitimate expectations.
—infringement of the obligation to state reasons arising from Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1784/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—