I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(Economic and monetary union - Banking union - Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) - Single Resolution Fund (SRF) - Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2020 ex ante contributions - Obligation to state reasons - Plea of illegality - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
(C/2025/4300)
Language of the case: German
Applicant: Max Heinr. Sutor OHG (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: A. Glos, M. Rätz, H.-U. Klöppel and M. Meisgeier, lawyers)
Defendant: Single Resolution Board (represented by: C. De Falco and T Wittenberg, acting as Agents, and by B. Meyring, T. Klupsch and S. Ianc, lawyers)
Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Triantafyllou and A. Steiblytė, acting as Agents)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of Decision SRB/ES/2022/80 of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) of 7 December 2022, withdrawing Decision SRB/ES/2020/24 of the SRB of 15 April 2020, on the calculation of the 2020 ex ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund, in so far as it concerns the institutions mentioned in Annex I to this Decision, and recalculating the 2020 ex ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund of these institutions, to the extent that it concerns the applicant.
1.The action is dismissed.
2.Each party shall bear its own costs.
—
(1) OJ C 279, 24.8.2020.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4300/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—