- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-300/19: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 November 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Social No 3 de Barcelona — Spain) — UQ v Marclean Technologies SLU (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Collective redundancies — Directive 98/59/EC — First subparagraph of Article 1(1)(a) — Definition of ‘collective redundancies’ — Methods of calculating the number of redundancies — Reference period take into account)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019CA0300
62019CA0300
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
18.1.2021
Official Journal of the European Union
C 19/6
(Case C-300/19) (*)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Social policy - Collective redundancies - Directive 98/59/EC - First subparagraph of Article 1(1)(a) - Definition of ‘collective redundancies’ - Methods of calculating the number of redundancies - Reference period take into account)
(2021/C 19/06)
Language of the case: Spanish
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: UQ
Defendant: Marclean Technologies SLU
Other parties: Ministerio Fiscal, Fondo de Garantía Salarial
Operative part of the judgment
Article 1(1), first subparagraph, (a) of Directive 98/59 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to collective redundancies must be interpreted in the sense that, with a view to determining whether a contested individual dismissal forms part of an instance of collective redundancy, the reference period laid down in that provision for determining the existence of collective redundancies must be calculated taking into account any period of 30 or 90 consecutive days during which that individual dismissal occurred and during which the largest number of dismissals were effected by the employer for one or more reasons not related to the individual worker concerned, within the meaning of that provision.
(*)
Language of the case: Spanish
ECLI:EU:C:2021:140