- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-201/15: Action brought on 22 April 2015 — Unicorn v OHIM — Mercilink Equipment Leasing (UNICORN)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015TN0201
62015TN0201
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 198/44
(Case T-201/15)
(2015/C 198/61)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Unicorn a.s. (Prague, Czech Republic) (represented by: L. Lorenc, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Mercilink Equipment Leasing Ltd (Limassol, Cyprus)
Details of the proceedings before OHIM
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘UNICORN’ — Community trade mark No 5 992 805
Procedure before OHIM: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 16 February 2015 in Case R 1699/2014-5
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—Annul the contested decision;
—Order OHIM to pay the costs.
Pleas in law
—OHIM did not properly take into consideration evidence submitted by the applicant;
—OHIM did not take into consideration evidence in Czech;
—OHIM incorrectly considered good reputation of the earlier trademarks.