10.9.2011

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/31

(Case C-332/11)

2011/C 269/59

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Prorail NV

Respondents:

FAG Kugelfischer GmbH

D B Schenker Rail Nederland NV

Nationale Maatschappij der Belgische Spoorwegen NV

Question referred

Must Articles 1 and 17 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001 (1) of 28 May 2001 on cooperation between the courts of the Member States in the taking of evidence in civil or commercial matters, in the light, inter alia, of European legislation concerning the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil or commercial matters, and of the principle expressed in Article 33(1) (2) that a judgment given in a Member State is to be recognised in the other Member States without any special procedure being required, be interpreted as meaning that the court which orders an investigation by a judicial expert whose task is to be carried out partly in the territory of the Member State to which the court belongs, but partly also in another Member State, must, for the direct performance of the latter part of the task, make use only and therefore exclusively of the method created by Regulation No 1206/2001 as referred to in Article 17 thereof, or as meaning that the judicial expert assigned by that country may also be charged with an investigation which is to be partly carried out in another Member State of the European Union, outside the provisions of Regulation No 1206/2001?

Language of the case: Dutch.

(1) OJ 2001 L 174, p. 1.

(2) OJ 2001 L 12, p. 1.