- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-568/20: Judgment of the General Court of 6 April 2022 — MF v eu-LISA (Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Post occupied requiring security clearance — Clearance refused by the national security authority — Termination of the contract — No request for a hearing — Right to be heard within the meaning of Article 11(5)(b) of Decision 2015/444)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TA0568
62020TA0568
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
27.6.2022
Official Journal of the European Union
C 244/26
(Case T-568/20) (*)
(Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - Post occupied requiring security clearance - Clearance refused by the national security authority - Termination of the contract - No request for a hearing - Right to be heard within the meaning of Article 11(5)(b) of Decision 2015/444)
(2022/C 244/33)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: MF (represented by: L. Levi, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (represented by: M. Chiodi, acting as Agent, and by A. Duron and D. Waelbroeck, lawyers)
Re:
By his action under Article 270 TFEU, lodged at the Registry of the General Court on 4 September 2020, the applicant seeks annulment, first, of the decision of the European Union Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (eu-LISA) of 29 October 2019 terminating his employment contract and, second, to the extent necessary, of the decision of eu-LISA of 26 May 2020 rejecting his complaint of 29 January 2020.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders MF to pay the costs.
(*)
Language of the case: English.
OJ C 399, 23.11.2020.