- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-293/21: Judgment of the General Court of 8 June 2022 — Muschaweck v EUIPO — Conze (UM) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark UM — Genuine use of the mark — Use with the consent of the proprietor — Use in the form in which the mark was registered — Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Representation by the proprietor of the trade mark — Evidence of use submitted within the time limit set)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TA0293
62021TA0293
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 294/28
(Case T-293/21) (*)
(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU word mark UM - Genuine use of the mark - Use with the consent of the proprietor - Use in the form in which the mark was registered - Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Representation by the proprietor of the trade mark - Evidence of use submitted within the time limit set)
(2022/C 294/40)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Ulrike Muschaweck (Munich, Germany) (represented by: C. Konle, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Joachim Conze (Munich) (represented by: H. Bolte, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 15 March 2021 (Case R 2260/2019-2), relating to revocation proceedings between Ms Muschaweck and Mr Conze.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Ms Ulrike Muschaweck to pay the costs.
(*)
Language of the case: German
ECLI:EU:C:2022:140