- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-619/15: Judgment of the General Court of 20 July 2017 — Badica and Kardiam v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in the Central African Republic — Freezing of funds — Initial decision to list — List of persons and entities covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources — Inclusion of the applicants’ names — Implementation of a UN resolution — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of defence — Presumption of innocence — Manifest error of assessment)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015TA0619
62015TA0619
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
28.8.2017
Official Journal of the European Union
C 283/34
(Case T-619/15) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
((Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures adopted against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in the Central African Republic - Freezing of funds - Initial decision to list - List of persons and entities covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources - Inclusion of the applicants’ names - Implementation of a UN resolution - Obligation to state reasons - Rights of defence - Presumption of innocence - Manifest error of assessment))
(2017/C 283/51)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicants: Bureau d’achat de diamant Centrafrique (Badica) (Bangui, Central African Republic) and Kardiam (Antwerp, Belgium) (represented by: D. Luff and L. Defalque, lawyers)
Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: B. Driessen and P. Mahnič Bruni, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking the annulment of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1485 of 2 September 2015 implementing Article 17(1) of Council Regulation (EU) No 224/2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in the Central African Republic (OJ 2015 L 229, p. 1).
Operative part of the judgment
The General Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Bureau d’achat de diamant Centrafrique (Badica) and Kardiam to pay the costs.
(<span class="note">1</span>) OJ C 27, 25.1.2016.