I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Series C
(Case T-293/22) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Civil service - Temporary staff - Reclassification - 2021 reclassification exercise - Decision not to reclassify - Article 54 of the CEOS - General provisions for the implementation of Article 54 of the CEOS - Obligation to consider comparative merits - Obligation to state reasons - Criterion relating to the level of responsibilties exercised - Seniority in the grade - Reclassification quotas - Equal treatment - Manifest error of assessment)
(C/2023/770)
Language of the case: French
Applicant: PB (represented by: N. de Montigny, lawyer)
Defendant: Single Resolution Board (represented by: H. Ehlers and L. Forestier, acting as Agents, and by D. Waelbroeck and A. Duron, lawyers)
By his action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) of 16 July 2021 not to reclassify him at the end of the 2021 reclassification exercise.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders PB to pay the costs.
Language of the case: French.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/770/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)