EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-17/10: Order of the General Court of 27 November 2012 — Steinberg v Commission (Action for annulment — Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents relating to funding decisions for grants to Israeli and Palestinian non-governmental organisations under the ‘Partnership for Peace’ programme and the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights — Partial refusal of access — Exception relating to the protection of the public interest as regards public security — Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62010TB0017

62010TB0017

November 27, 2012
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

26.1.2013

Official Journal of the European Union

C 26/44

(Case T-17/10)(Action for annulment - Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents relating to funding decisions for grants to Israeli and Palestinian non-governmental organisations under the ‘Partnership for Peace’ programme and the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights - Partial refusal of access - Exception relating to the protection of the public interest as regards public security - Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

2013/C 26/86

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Gerald Steinberg (Jerusalem, Israel) (represented by: T. Asserson, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Tufvesson and C. ten Dam, Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision SG.E.3/MV/psi D(2009) 3914 of 15 May 2009, partially refusing the applicant access to certain documents relating to funding decisions for grants to Israeli and Palestinian non-governmental organisations under the ‘Partnership for Peace’ programme and the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR)

Operative part of the order

1.The action is dismissed as, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly lacking any foundation in law;

2.Mr Gerald Steinberg shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

Language of the case: English

(1) OJ C 80, 27.3.2010.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia