I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
—
(Appeal - Environment - Directive 2003/87/EC - System for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the European Union - Free allocation of allowances - Article 10a(1) - Concept of ‘substitutes’ - National implementing measures - Article 11(1) - Lists of installations covered by Directive 2003/87 submitted to the European Commission by the Member States - Decision (EU) 2021/355 - Proposal of the Member State concerned to cover by a benchmark for sintered ore a sub-installation producing iron ore pellets - Rejection decision - Establishment of benchmarks by the Commission - General objective of incentivising the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions - No obligation of result - Article 296 TFEU - Obligation to state reasons for decisions of the EU institutions)
(C/2025/3857)
Language of the case: English
Appellant: Luossavaara-Kiirunavaara AB (represented by: A. Bryngelsson, A. Johansson and F. Sjövall, advokater)
Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: B. De Meester and G. Wils, acting as Agents), Kingdom of Sweden (represented by: C. Meyer-Seitz and R. Shahsavan Eriksson, acting as Agents)
The Court:
1.Dismisses the appeal;
2.Orders Luossavaara-Kiirunavaara AB to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;
3.Orders the Kingdom of Sweden to bear its own costs.
—
(1) OJ C, C/2023/967.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3857/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—