- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-566/22, Inkreal: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 February 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší soud – Czech Republic) – Inkreal s.r.o. v Dúha reality s.r.o. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Scope – Article 25 – Agreement conferring jurisdiction – Parties to a contract established in the same Member State – Jurisdiction of the courts of another Member State to settle disputes arising from that contract – International element)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022CA0566
62022CA0566
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2024/2276
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 February 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší soud — Czech Republic) — Inkreal s.r.o. v Dúha reality s.r.o.
(Case C-566/22, (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>) Inkreal)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Judicial cooperation in civil matters - Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters - Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 - Scope - Article 25 - Agreement conferring jurisdiction - Parties to a contract established in the same Member State - Jurisdiction of the courts of another Member State to settle disputes arising from that contract - International element)
(C/2024/2276)
Language of the case: Czech
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Inkreal s.r.o.
Defendant: Dúha reality s.r.o.
Operative part of the judgment
Article 25(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters
must be interpreted as meaning that an agreement conferring jurisdiction by which the parties to a contract who are established in the same Member State agree on the jurisdiction of the courts of another Member State to settle disputes arising out of that contract is covered under that provision, even if that contract has no other connection with that other Member State.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2276/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
*
Language of the case: Czech.
* * *
—