- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-286/08: Action brought on 21 July 2008 — Fidelio KG v OHIM
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62008TN0286
62008TN0286
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
27.9.2008
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 247/17
(Case T-286/08)
(2008/C 247/33)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: Fidelio KG (Linz, Austria) (represented by M. Gail, acting as Agent)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Form of order sought
—Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 21 May 2008 (case R 632/2007-4);
—Order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) to pay its own costs as well as those of the applicant.
Pleas in law and main arguments
Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘Hallux’ for goods in Classes 10, 18 and 25 (Application No 5 245 147).
Decision of the Examiner: Partial refusal of the application.
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal partially upheld.
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (1), as the registered marks concerning the goods ‘orthopaedic article’ and ‘footwear’ do not present any absolute grounds for refusal.
(1) Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).