EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-17/18: Action brought on 19 January 2018 — Delfant Hoylaerts v Commission

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018TN0017

62018TN0017

January 19, 2018
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 104/44

(Case T-17/18)

(2018/C 104/57)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Isabelle Delfant Hoylaerts (Montredon-des-Corbières, France) (represented by: E. Conquet, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul the Commission’s Rejection Decision of 21 March 2017;

annul the Commission’s implicit Rejection Decision of 20 October 2017;

order the Commission to bear the costs relating to the medico-educational institution from 20 October 2017;

order the Commission to pay to Ms Delfant Hoylaerts EUR 3 000 in damages as compensation for the financial and non-material losses suffered;

order the Commission to pay the costs and to pay to Ms Delfant Hoylaerts EUR 3 000 in respect of non-recoverable expenses.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 72 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union, the provisions of which have been adopted by the joint rules on sickness insurance for officials of the European Union, in particular Article 20, and by the Guide to Commission assistance for disabled children of staff entitled under the Staff Regulations.

According to the applicant, the Commission infringed the above provisions by adopting the decision to refuse to bear costs relating to a medico-educational institution (‘MEI’) for her disabled child. In that respect, she submits that that decision is based on a purely administrative misunderstanding and that the legal basis relied on by the Commission is lacking.

Finally, the applicant claims that the unfair conduct on the part of the Commission has serious consequences in that the Commission is incapable of taking sole responsibility for the costs of the MEI where the MEI is essential for her child. Thus, her psychological and financial circumstances have been exacerbated by the fault on the Commission’s part.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia