- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Order of the Court (Third Chamber) of 25 January 2007.#František Koval'ský v Mesto Prešov and Dopravný podnik Mesta Prešov, a.s.#Reference for a preliminary ruling: Krajský súd v Prešove - Slovakia.#Reference for a preliminary ruling - Protocol to the Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms - Property law - Electrical installations on private land without compensation for the owners - Lack of jurisdiction of the Court.#Case C-302/06.
ECLI:EU:C:2007:64
62006CO0302
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C‑302/06)
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protocol to the European Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms – Property law – Electrical installations on private land without compensation for the owners – Lack of jurisdiction of the Court
Preliminary rulings – Jurisdiction of the Court (Art. 234 EC) (see paras 15-22)
Re:
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Krajský súd v Prešove – Interpretation of Article 6 EU and Article 1 of the Protocol to the Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, signed in Paris on 20 March 1952 – Property law – National legislation under which electrical installations may be placed on private land without the owners being entitled to compensation.
Operative part
The Court of Justice of the European Communities clearly has no jurisdiction to answer the questions referred by the Krajský súd v Prešove V by decisions of 2 May and 21 July 2006.