I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
C series
—
13.1.2025
(C/2025/141)
Language of the case: German
Applicant: JG
Defendant: Hauptzollamt Düsseldorf
1)Must Article 3i(1) of Regulation (EU) No 833/2014, as amended by Regulation (EU) 2022/576, be interpreted as meaning that the prohibition on the importation or transfer of goods, as listed in Annex XXI, applies only if it can be established that the goods in question generate significant revenues for Russia thereby enabling its actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine?
2)If the answer to the first question is in the negative: Must Article 3i(3ad) of Regulation (EU) No 833/2014, as amended by Regulation (EU) 2023/2878, be interpreted as meaning that the registration permitted thereunder of a vehicle which was in the territory of the Union on 19 December 2023 also applies to a motor vehicle which is not covered by Article 3i(3ab) or (3ac) of Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 and whose importation or transfer into the Union is prohibited under Article 3i(1) of Regulation (EU) No 833/2014, and the competent customs authority must lift the seizure of the vehicle concerned despite that prohibition?
Council Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 of 31 July 2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2014 L 229, p. 1).
Council Regulation (EU) 2022/576 of 8 April 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2022 L 111, p. 1).
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/141/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—