- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-347/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Milano (Italy) lodged on 28 May 2018 — Avv. Alessandro Salvoni v Anna Maria Fiermonte
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018CN0347
62018CN0347
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-347/18)
Language of the case: Italian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Avv. Alessandro Salvoni
Defendant: Anna Maria Fiermonte
Question referred
Should Article 53 of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 (1) and Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union be interpreted as meaning that it is not possible for the court of origin, which has been requested to issue the certificate provided for in Article 53 of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 with regard to a judgment that has acquired the force of a res judicata, to exercise powers of its own motion to ascertain whether there has been a breach of the rules set out in Chapter II, Section 4 of the Brussels Ibis Regulation, so that it may inform the consumer of any breach that is established and enable the consumer to consider, in full knowledge of the facts, the possibility of availing himself of the remedy provided for in Article 45 of the Regulation?
(1) Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ 2012 L 351, p. 1).
* * *
Language of the case: Italian.