EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-112/24: Action brought on 21 Febraury 2024 – Deutsche Bank and BHW Bausparkasse v ECB

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TN0112

62024TN0112

February 21, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

C series

C/2024/2774

29.4.2024

Action brought on 21 February 2024 – Deutsche Bank and BHW Bausparkasse v ECB

(Case T-112/24)

(C/2024/2774)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Deutsche Bank AG (Frankfurt am Main, Germany), BHW Bausparkasse AG (Hameln, Germany) (represented by: H. Berger, M. Weber and D. Schoo, lawyers)

Defendant: European Central Bank

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:

partially annul the decision of the ECB of 8 December 2023 including Annexes I and II with regard to the requirements imposed on the applicants pursuant to Part I, paragraph 4.1, of the decision;

order the ECB to pay the costs

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants rely on two pleas in law.

1.First plea in law, alleging that the ECB has infringed Union law by exceeding the powers conferred on it in Article 4 and Article 16 of Council Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 (1) and breaching basic principles of Union law, as there is no provision in Union law permitting Part I, paragraph 4.1, of the contested decision, concerning the prudential treatment of irrevocable payment commitments (“IPC Requirement”), and alleging further that the ECB failed to carry out an individual and methodologically correct examination of the applicants’ situation and that the IPC Requirement is based on inaccurate facts and several manifest errors of assessment.

2.Second plea in law, alleging that the ECB has breached the principle of proportionality by requiring a deduction of the full amount of irrevocable payment commitments from the applicants’ Common Equity Tier 1 (CET 1) capital on a consolidated and/or individual level, without taking into account the individual situation of the applicants and setting a deduction appropriate to the applicants’ individual risk profile and level of liquidity, and without properly appreciating mitigating factors.

Council Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 of 15 October 2013 conferring specific tasks on the European Central Bank concerning policies relating to the prudential supervision of credit institutions (OJ 2013 L 287, p 63).

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2774/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia