- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-446/20: Action brought on 8 July 2020 — Confédération nationale du Crédit mutuel and Others v SRB
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TN0446
62020TN0446
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
14.9.2020
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 304/15
(Case T-446/20)
(2020/C 304/18)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicants: Confédération nationale du Crédit mutuel (Paris, France) and the 25 other applicants (represented by: A. Gosset-Grainville, M. Trabucchi and M. Dalon, lawyers)
Defendant: Single Resolution Board
Form of order sought
The applicants claim that the Court should:
—pursuant to Article 263 TFEU, annul decision SRB/ES/2020/24 on the calculation of the 2020 ex-ante contributions to the SRF in so far as it concerns the applicants;
—pursuant to Article 277 TFEU, declare the following provisions of the SRM Regulation, the Implementing Regulation and the Delegated Regulation inapplicable:
—Articles 69(1), 69(2), 70(1) and 70(2)(a) and (b) of the SRM Regulation;
—Articles 4(2), 6 and 7 of the Delegated Regulation, and Annex I thereto;
—Article 4 of the Implementing Regulation;
—order the defendant to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicants rely on four pleas in law which are which are, in essence, identical or similar to those raised in Case T-444/20, Société générale and Others v SRB.