I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
((Emoluments of Members of the Parliament - Old-age pension - Obligation for French Members to claim their pension rights from the national schemes - Rule against overlapping - Implementing measures for the Statute for Members - Decision adopted at the conclusion of the complaint procedure - Debit note - Decision to suspend payment of the pension - Adversarial principle - Reasonable period - Obligation to state reasons))
(2016/C 118/31)
Language of the case: French
Applicant: François Musso (Ajaccio, France) (represented by: A. Gross and L. Stachnik, lawyers)
Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: G. Corstens and S. Seyr, acting as Agents)
First, application for annulment of the decision of the Bureau of the Parliament of 26 June 2014 confirming the decision of the Secretary-General of the Parliament of 17 October 2011 which determined the monthly amount of pension rights, taking into account the sums received from two French pension schemes, and by which recovery of EUR 127 065,19 was determined and, second, application for annulment of the decision of the Parliament of 22 September 2014.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the actions;
2.Orders Mr François Musso to bear his own costs and to pay those of the European Parliament.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 351 of 6.10.2014.