I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2022/C 257/26)
Language of the case: German
Appellant: NK
Respondent authority: Bezirkshauptmannschaft Feldkirch
Is the principle of [ne] bis in idem, as guaranteed by Article 50 of the Charter, to be interpreted as meaning that the competent administrative penal authority of a Member State is prevented from imposing a fine on a person for infringement of a provision of the legislation on games of chance if administrative penal proceedings brought previously against the same person for an infringement of a different provision of the legislation on games of chance (or, more generally, a rule from the same field of law), which were based on the same facts, were finally terminated after an oral hearing with the taking of evidence had been held?