- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-471/18: Order of the General Court of 29 January 2020 — WV v EEAS (Action for annulment — Civil service — Civil servants — Salary deductions — Unauthorised absences — Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure — Failure to comply with formal requirements — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded in law)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018TB0471
62018TB0471
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
30.3.2020
Official Journal of the European Union
C 103/30
(Case T-471/18) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
(Action for annulment - Civil service - Civil servants - Salary deductions - Unauthorised absences - Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure - Failure to comply with formal requirements - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded in law)
(2020/C 103/42)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: WV (represented by É. Boigelot, lawyer)
Defendant: European External Action Service (represented by S. Marquardt and R. Spac, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking annulment, first, of the EEAS’s decision of 27 November 2017 imposing a salary deduction amounting to 72 calendar days and, second, in so far as necessary, the EEAS’s decision of 2 May 2018 rejecting the applicant’s complaint of 3 January 2018.
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed as, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly unfounded in law.
2.WV is ordered to pay the costs.
(<span class="note"> <a id="ntr1-C_2020103EN.01003001-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2020103EN.01003001-E0001">*1</a> </span>) OJ C 364, 8.10.2018.