- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-592/18: Judgment of the General Court of 28 November 2019 — Wywiał-Prząda v Commission (Civil service — Contract staff — Remuneration — Decision refusing to grant expatriation allowance — Article 4(1)(a) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations — Work done for another State — Diplomatic status — Five-year reference period)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018TA0592
62018TA0592
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 19/45
(Case T-592/18) (1)
(Civil service - Contract staff - Remuneration - Decision refusing to grant expatriation allowance - Article 4(1)(a) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations - Work done for another State - Diplomatic status - Five-year reference period)
(2020/C 19/53)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Katarzyna Wywiał-Prząda (Wezembeek-Oppem, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Bohr and D. Milanowska, acting as Agents)
Re:
Action under Article 270 TFEU for the annulment of Commission Decision of 23 November 2017 by which the applicant was refused expatriation allowance.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Ms Katarzyna Wywiał-Prząda to pay the costs.
(1) OJ C 427, 26.11.2018.