- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-414/17: Action brought on 3 July 2017 — Vorarlberger Landes- und Hypothekenbank v SRB
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TN0414
62017TN0414
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
21.8.2017
Official Journal of the European Union
C 277/53
(Case T-414/17)
(2017/C 277/76)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Vorarlberger Landes- und Hypothekenbank AG (Bregenz, Austria) (represented by: G. Eisenberger, lawyer)
Defendant: Einheitlicher Abwicklungsausschuss (SRB)
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the court should:
—annul the decision of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) (‘Decision of the Executive Session of the Board of 11 April 2017 on the calculation of the 2017 ex-ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRB/ES/SRF/2017/05)’), and in any event to the extent that that decision concerns the applicant; and
—order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging a flagrant breach of essential procedural requirements by reason of incomplete notification of the decision
2.Second plea in law, alleging a flagrant breach of essential procedural requirements by reason of an inadequate statement of reasons for the decision